NBDF
← Back to the foundry

Tool · v1.0

// engineering suite

Storm Drainage Toolkit

Pipe sizing, inlet capacity, detention basin volume, and outlet structures — quick-reference calculations for small-site storm drain design. Preliminary, order-of-magnitude sizing only, not a comprehensive design suite. US customary units; every method documented inline.

CALCULATORS07
WORKFLOWS04
UNITSUS CUST.
BASISFHWA · HEC

02 · Hydrology

Peak runoff

CALCULATE ON DEMAND

Rational Method peak flow

Peak runoff from a small drainage area — the feed value for the pipe-sizing, detention, and outlet calculators below. Rainfall intensity comes from the local IDF curve; it is regional and is not built in.

Peak flow Q

cfs

Time of concentration Tc

min

Method & References
Q (cfs) = C · i · A Tc (min) = 0.0078 · L^0.77 · S^−0.385 (Kirpich; S in ft/ft)

Variables & units: C — runoff coefficient (dimensionless); i — rainfall intensity, in/hr, from the local IDF curve at the design return period and Tc; A — drainage area, acres; L — longest flow path, ft; S — mean flow-path slope, ft/ft.

Typical C values (Industry Approximation — Verify with PE)C
Pavement / asphalt / concrete0.85–0.95
Roofs0.85–0.95
Gravel0.40–0.70
Lawn, flat (sandy → heavy soil)0.10–0.25
Lawn, steep (sandy → heavy soil)0.15–0.35
Composite site — area-weight the partsΣCᵢAᵢ / ΣAᵢ

Assumptions & limitations: small, hydrologically simple areas (commonly capped near 100–200 acres by agency policy); uniform rainfall over the whole area for a duration ≥ Tc; C constant over the storm. Intensity–duration–frequency data are regional — this tool does not hardcode an IDF curve, so i must be read from the governing agency's curves at the computed Tc. Many agencies apply a Tc floor of 5–10 min. Kirpich was calibrated on small rural Tennessee watersheds; check the governing manual's preferred Tc method for paved sites.

Source: Rational Method per FHWA HEC-22 (Urban Drainage Design Manual), Ch. 3; Kirpich (1940). C values are generic textbook ranges (e.g. HEC-22 Table 3-1) — use the governing agency's table.

03 · Conveyance

Pipes & inlets

Storm drain pipe sizing

Minimum circular pipe diameter by Manning's equation at full flow, rounded up to the nearest standard size, with the flow depth at design Q in the selected pipe.

Recommended standard size

in

Minimum computed diameter

in

Full-flow capacity of standard size

cfs

Utilization Q / Qfull

%

Flow depth at design Q, d/D

%

Method & References
Q (cfs) = (1.49/n) · A · R^(2/3) · S^(1/2), R = D/4 (full circular) D_req (ft) = [ Q·n / (0.4644·√S) ]^(3/8)

Variables & units: Q — design flow, cfs; n — Manning roughness (dimensionless, empirical); S — pipe slope, ft/ft; D — inside diameter, ft; A — flow area, ft²; R — hydraulic radius, ft. Standard sizes carried: 12, 15, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, 60 in.

Manning's n guidance: concrete 0.013; PVC 0.010–0.011; HDPE (smooth interior) 0.012–0.013; CMP 0.024. The dropdown carries one representative value per material — confirm against the manufacturer and the governing manual.

Assumptions & limitations: gravity flow, uniform (normal) depth, barrel not surcharged. The d/D readout solves partial circular flow at the design Q by the same equation. Storm drains are commonly designed near d/D ≤ 0.8–1.0 for the design storm — the governing standard controls. Junction, bend, and inlet losses (hydraulic grade line) are not modeled; check minimum self-cleansing velocity (typ. ≥ 2–3 fps).

Source: Manning's equation per FHWA HEC-22 Ch. 5 and standard hydraulics practice. n values: Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

Inlet capacity — sump condition

Interception capacity of a grate or curb-opening inlet in a sag (sump). Scope is sump/sag inlets only — on-grade interception efficiency is materially more complex and is not modeled here.

Interception capacity

cfs

Controlling regime

Weir-flow capacity

cfs

Orifice-flow capacity (grate)

cfs

Method & References
Grate, weir: Q = Cw · P · d^1.5 (Cw ≈ 3.0) Grate, orifice: Q = Co · A · √(2g·d) (Co ≈ 0.67; d ≳ 0.4 ft) Curb, weir: Q = Cw · L · d^1.5 (Cw ≈ 3.0–3.6)

Variables & units: d — ponding depth at the inlet, ft (over the grate; to the curb-opening lip); P — grate perimeter available to flow, ft, excluding the side against the curb; A — clear (open) grate area, ft²; L — curb opening length, ft; g = 32.174 ft/s².

Assumptions & limitations: sag/sump locations only — all approaching flow ponds at the inlet, so interception is a capacity problem, not an efficiency problem. Grate capacity is reported as the lesser of the weir and orifice values, which is conservative through the transition zone (d ≈ 0.4–1.4 ft for typical grates). Capacities are unclogged; HEC-22 recommends designing sag grates for ~50% clogging (curb openings are less clogging-prone). Curb openings transition to orifice flow when depth exceeds ~1.4 × the opening height — outside this calculator's range.

Source: FHWA HEC-22 (Urban Drainage Design Manual), Ch. 4, inlets in sag locations. Coefficients are HEC-22 defaults: Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

04 · Detention

Storage & release

Detention basin sizing — preliminary

Required storage by the Modified Rational Method with a triangular hydrograph, checked across several trial storm durations to approximate the critical duration.

Required storage Vs

cf

Required storage

ac-ft

Governing duration

min

Governing inflow

cfs

Method & References
Vs (cf) = (Qin − Qout) · Td · 60 / 2 (per trial duration; largest governs)

Variables & units: Qin — peak inflow, cfs, from the Rational Method at the IDF intensity for each trial duration; Qout — allowable release rate, cfs (the downstream or pre-development constraint); Td — trial storm duration, min.

Why several durations: shorter storms are more intense (higher Qin) but briefer; longer storms are weaker but deliver volume for longer. The critical duration is the one that maximizes Vs, so this simple method requires checking several — enter one Qin per duration (re-run calculator 01 with the IDF intensity at each Td). A single Qin may be broadcast across all durations for a quick upper-bound pass, but it makes the longest duration govern by construction.

Assumptions & limitations: triangular inflow and outflow approximation with release at a constant Qout; no routing, stage-storage, or outlet rating. Small-site preliminary sizing only — not a substitute for full hydrograph routing (TR-55/TR-20 or continuous simulation) on larger or complex sites, and many agencies mandate a specific method.

Source: Modified Rational Method, standard drainage-manual practice built on the Rational Method of FHWA HEC-22 Ch. 3. Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

Detention outlet structure — orifice + weir

Size the low-flow orifice for the allowable release, or the emergency overflow weir length, from a target discharge and the available head.

Required orifice diameter

in

Orifice area

ft²

Required weir length

ft

Method & References
Orifice: Q = Cd · A · √(2g·h) → A = Q / (Cd·√(2g·h)) Weir: Q = Cw · L · H^1.5 → L = Q / (Cw·H^1.5)

Variables & units: Cd — orifice discharge coefficient (≈ 0.6 for a sharp-edged orifice); h — head from the design water surface to the orifice centroid, ft; Cw — rectangular sharp-crested weir coefficient (3.0–3.33); H — head above the weir crest, ft; L — weir length, ft; g = 32.174 ft/s².

Assumptions & limitations: free (unsubmerged) discharge on both elements; end contractions and velocity of approach ignored; single-stage release at the design water surface. Multi-stage outlets need a rating curve across the full stage range. Small orifices clog — many agencies set a minimum orifice size and require a trash rack.

Source: standard orifice and sharp-crested weir equations per FHWA HEC-22 and hydraulics texts (e.g. Brater & King). Coefficients: Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

05 · Outfalls

Culverts & outlet protection

Culvert capacity screening — inlet vs. outlet control

Headwater for a circular culvert under inlet control and outlet control, reporting the controlling condition against the allowable headwater. Screening only — final design follows the full HDS-5 procedure.

Controlling headwater

ft

Controlling condition

Inlet-control headwater

ft

Outlet-control headwater

ft

Method & References
F = Q / (A·D^0.5) Inlet, unsubmerged (F ≤ 3.5): HW/D = Hc/D + K·F^M + cs·S Inlet, submerged (F ≥ 4.0): HW/D = c·F² + Y + cs·S Outlet (full flow): H = [1 + ke + 29·n²·L / R^(4/3)] · V²/2g HWo = max(TW, (dc+D)/2) + H − S·L

Variables & units: D — barrel diameter, ft; A — barrel area, ft²; dc — critical depth in the barrel, ft (computed); Hc — specific head at critical depth, ft; K, M, c, Y — HDS-5 inlet-control constants by entrance type; cs — slope-term coefficient (−0.5 standard; +0.7 mitered); ke — entrance loss coefficient; n — barrel Manning roughness (concrete 0.012, CMP 0.024); TW — tailwater above the outlet invert, ft. Between F = 3.5 and 4.0 the two inlet equations are interpolated linearly.

Assumptions & limitations: single circular barrel, no inlet depression, no skew. Outlet control uses the full-barrel-flow approximation, which is conservative for partly full barrels at low headwater. The inlet-control fits apply to roughly HW/D ≤ 3 (the nomograph range). The larger of the two headwaters governs. Roadway overtopping, buoyancy/uplift, and scour are not checked.

Source: FHWA HDS-5 (Hydraulic Design of Highway Culverts) — inlet-control nomograph-fit constants per Appendix A and entrance-loss coefficients per the outlet-control tables; simplified per screening practice (FHWA's HY-8 implements the full method). Constants: Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

Outlet protection — riprap apron sizing

Median riprap stone size and apron dimensions for a minor circular outlet, per the simplified HEC-14 apron method. Energy dissipators and complex outlets need full HEC-14 analysis.

Median stone size d50

in

Apron length

ft

Apron width at downstream end

ft

Method & References
Fd (—) = Q / (√g · D^2.5) (discharge intensity) d50 (ft) = 0.2 · D · Fd^(4/3) · (D / TW) La (ft) = D · (8 + 17 · log10 Fd), min 4·D W (ft) = 3·D + (2/3)·La

Variables & units: D — outlet pipe diameter, ft; Q — design discharge, cfs; TW — tailwater depth used in the stone-size relation, ft (minimal/unknown → 0.4·D; adequate → 1.0·D); g = 32.174 ft/s².

Assumptions & limitations: minor circular outlet discharging onto a flat apron with no defined downstream channel; apron level, flared to the width W at its downstream end; riprap layer thickness typically 2×d50 over filter fabric or granular filter. High discharge intensity (Fd ≳ 2.5), drop outlets, steep or confined receiving channels, and supercritical approach flow are outside the simplified method — use a full HEC-14 energy-dissipator design. Round d50 up to the nearest local riprap class.

Source: FHWA HEC-14 (Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators), riprap apron design, simplified. Tailwater-condition assumptions: Industry Approximation — Verify with PE.

06 · Disclaimer

Engineering reference tool only. Calculations are provided for preliminary engineering evaluation and must be independently verified by a licensed professional engineer against the applicable editions of governing standards, references, and agency requirements. Use of this software does not replace applicable engineering judgment, governing codes, manufacturer guidance, or agency standards.